Political impact after Trump's promise to eliminate humanitarian parole

Trump promises to eliminate parole and control the CBP One application.

Donald Trump © CiberCuba
Donald TrumpPhoto © CiberCuba

Former President Donald Trump has sparked an intense political debate after promising that, if reelected in November, he will eliminate the humanitarian parole program and the CBP One application, which allow the entry of Cuban, Haitian, Nicaraguan, and Venezuelan migrants into the United States.

This announcement comes in a context of growing concern about migration and its impact on national security, with which the Republican hopes to maintain conservative support in the country. However, another sector that has benefited from these programs could change its mind regarding its voting intention.

In a message directed at migrants, Trump warned: "Prepare to leave, especially if you are criminals." This statement, like his proposal to close the borders, has sparked varied reactions, with criticisms from both immigration lawyers and political activists.

Avelino González, an immigration lawyer, highlighted in statements to Telemundo 51 that although the elimination of these programs can be carried out by a new president, the effective deportation of migrants would require a judicial order.

Since its implementation in January 2023, humanitarian parole has faced multiple challenges, including legal disputes questioning its validity and pauses due to fraud cases. Despite its controversial nature, it is estimated that between 70,000 and 80,000 immigrants enter the United States legally each month under this program.

The reaction from members of the Republican Party has been strong. Kevin Cabrera, a Republican leader, criticized the Biden administration for allowing the entry of more than 10 million people without adequate control, suggesting that this has facilitated the arrival of criminal groups.

On the other hand, Luis Fernando Atencio, a democratic activist, questioned the seriousness of Trump's proposals, arguing that they lack a clear plan and are rather attacks on immigrants.

The impact of these comments can be significant on the electorate and was evident in the presidential debate between Trump and his Democratic rival Kamala Harris.

Trump lost points by accusing immigrants of eating dogs and cats in areas close to the land borders with Mexico; while Harris gained points in her favor by stating that the Biden Administration's proposals to solve the immigration problem were stalled due to Trump's influence.

Families that have traditionally voted for Republicans but have benefited from programs like parole might reevaluate their support for Trump.

Avelino González recalled that a candidate's actions do not always reflect what a president can or wants to do, which adds a level of uncertainty to the situation.

Meanwhile, Kamala Harris's campaign has not addressed concerns about the future of these programs in the event of a Democratic victory.

What do you think?

COMMENT

Filed under:


Do you have something to report? Write to CiberCuba:

editors@cibercuba.com +1 786 3965 689