Judge in the United States halts Trump's mass layoff plan for this key reason

Judge Susan Illston temporarily blocked the staff cuts and agency closures proposed by the White House.


A federal judge in California temporarily blocked the controversial mass layoff plan pushed by the Donald Trump administration. This is the first judicial setback against the governmental restructuring promoted by the Republican president.

The decision, issued by Judge Susan Illston of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, orders a suspension of the implementation of layoffs, as well as the closure of federal offices and programs, arguing that such actions cannot be carried out without the approval of Congress.

"It is the prerogative of presidents to promote new political priorities (...), but to implement large-scale reforms in federal agencies, any president must rely on the assistance of their co-equal and partner branch, Congress," wrote Illston in a 42-page order published on May 9.

He insisted that the president must seek the cooperation of Congress to implement the changes he is pursuing. In line with this, he issued a temporary order to halt large-scale layoffs.

Internal tensions and legal complaints

Trump's plan, backed by the mogul Elon Musk and the controversial Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has raised concerns among federal unions as well as legislators, including those within the Republican Party, due to its speed and scope.

In early April, the Department of Health and Human Services laid off 10,000 employees. Personnel cuts have also been announced at the Forest Service, the National Park Service, and NOAA, which could leave thousands of people without jobs.

Trump stated in March that layoffs would be decided by his cabinet secretaries and not directly by Musk or DOGE, but the pressure to implement cuts remains present. "If they can cut, that's better. If not, Elon will make the cut," the president warned on his platform Truth Social.

The judicial measure responds to a lawsuit filed by unions and civil organizations arguing that the president is overstepping his authority by ordering dismissals without a proper legislative process.

Trump has tried to calm the waters within his cabinet and in front of public opinion, insisting that his goal is to "keep the best and most productive people," and that the cuts must be surgical, not massive.

However, sources close to Congress indicate that the speed and lack of transparency in the dismissals have caused friction even among Republican allies.

The suspension ordered by Judge Illston represents a temporary relief for thousands of federal workers, but the White House insists that the cuts will continue in order to reduce spending and combat waste.

The ongoing restructuring of the American state apparatus is one of the most aggressive since World War II and seems to be moving towards an unprecedented concentration of power. The court ruling could signal the beginning of a protracted legal battle with profound consequences for the future of the federal government.

Frequently Asked Questions about Trump's Mass Layoff Plan Blockade

Why did Judge Susan Illston block Trump's mass layoff plan?

Judge Susan Illston blocked the plan because she believed that mass layoffs cannot occur without Congressional approval. In her ruling, Illston argued that to implement large-scale reforms in federal agencies, the president needs to have the support of Congress, which had not been achieved in this case.

What is Elon Musk's role in Trump's budget-cutting plan?

Elon Musk leads the Government Efficiency Department (DOGE), responsible for implementing the budget-cutting plan. Musk has been a key figure in Trump's strategy to reduce public spending, driving massive personnel cuts across various federal agencies with the goal of improving government efficiency.

What impact could the temporary suspension of layoffs have on federal workers?

The temporary suspension represents a relief for thousands of federal workers who were facing the possibility of losing their jobs. However, the White House has indicated that cuts will continue, which means uncertainty persists for many federal employees.

How has Congress reacted to the cuts proposed by Trump and Musk?

The Congress has shown frictions, even among Republican allies, due to the speed and lack of transparency in the proposed layoffs. Some legislators have expressed their concerns about the impact of these cuts on the operations of the agencies and the stability of the affected workers.

Filed under:

CiberCuba Editorial Team

A team of journalists committed to reporting on Cuban current affairs and topics of global interest. At CiberCuba, we work to deliver truthful news and critical analysis.