Related videos:
Cubans on social media responded angrily to Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez, who stated during the 58th session of the Human Rights Council that Cuba would remain steadfast in its "creative and selfless resistance," defending national sovereignty and the principles of the socialist state.
The official assured that "the voice of Cuba will continue to be heard in defense of the full dignity of man," reported the state-run portal Cubadebate on Facebook.
However, the publication sparked angry responses from several Cubans, who quickly criticized what they perceive as a contrast between Rodríguez's statements and the harsh reality faced by the people on the island: "It’s easy to call for resistance when one lives with all the comforts," they emphasized.
Some citizens questioned the authenticity of the calls for resistance, pointing out the disconnect between the leaders and the daily struggles faced by the population.
"This Bruno should be taken to the Guantanamo Naval Base, to force the Cuban people to resist while they live like capitalists. It's easy to call for resistance when one enjoys all the comforts," commented one of the critics.
Others expressed their frustration, believing that the leaders are not examples of resilience but rather enjoy a life of privilege.
"Creativity is nonexistent, and it is not right for the resistance to rely solely on the people; leaders should be the first examples of resistance, and if they look closely, they will realize that they are not," stated a citizen.
Jorge Vega Ramos was more direct: "What nerve, while the majority of the people are being killed alive, they talk about resistance, while they live better than millionaires. But those of us who resist are the people. You live a full life."
Luis Hernández Batista, for his part, labeled the officials as "hypocrites," and denounced that while the people suffer in misery, the leaders enjoy "full bellies," preaching from their comfortable positions.
"From their comforts, they do not know what it is to endure blackouts for 23 hours a day or to live in scarcity; anyone can speak of resilience when their needs are fully met," he commented.
Other Cubans stated that the terms resistance and creativity have become unbearable for the population that has no choice but to endure life under an authoritarian and totalitarian regime.
"Creativity and resilience have died, and there isn't even a hearse to bury them. That's why they stink so much," summarized an internet user.
Frequently asked questions about resistance in Cuba and the statements by Bruno Rodríguez
What criticisms have Bruno Rodríguez's statements about the resistance in Cuba generated?
Bruno Rodríguez's statements about resistance in Cuba have been criticized for their disconnection from the reality of the Cuban people. Many citizens believe that leaders enjoy privileges and do not suffer the same hardships that the population faces, which makes their calls for resistance seem hypocritical.
How does the Cuban population respond to the government's calls to resist?
The Cuban population has responded with indignation to the government's calls for resistance, pointing out that the example of resistance should start with the leaders themselves. Citizens criticize the disconnect between the leaders' words and the harsh living conditions they face daily.
What impact does the Cuban government's approach have on the quality of life of its population?
The focus of the Cuban government, which centers on maintaining its ideological model, negatively impacts the quality of life of the population. This translates into problems such as prolonged blackouts, shortages of food and medicine, and a stagnant economy that does not provide effective solutions to the basic needs of citizens.
Filed under:
