Related videos:
In a surprising turn within the debate on healthcare reform in the United States, Donald Trump has directed harsh criticism at large insurance companies, accusing them of profiting "for far too long" at the expense of the American people.
Through his platform Truth Social, Trump delivered a strong message this Tuesday: he will only support a healthcare system that returns money directly to citizens, excluding insurance companies from the equation.
"Power to the people!"
"The only way to have an excellent healthcare system in the United States is to send the money directly to the people," Trump wrote in capital letters, in a post that mixes economic populism with a promise of radical structural change.
“Nothing should go to the big, fat, wealthy insurance companies that have made billions of dollars and scammed the United States for a long time,” he declared.
In their proposal, citizens would be able to negotiate and purchase their own insurance independently, supposedly under better conditions than the current ones.
“Power to the people!”, Trump concluded, urging Congress to set aside any other legislative initiatives that do not include this path. “Do it now!” he demanded.
A message that transcends party lines
Although Trump's stance may sound disruptive within the traditional framework of the Republican Party— which has long defended free enterprise and non-intervention in private markets— he claims that even some Democrats have expressed sympathy for his proposal.
According to what he said over the weekend, he has held "personal conversations with Democrats" who "love" the idea of eliminating corporate intermediaries from the healthcare system.
The tone and content of his statements could be interpreted as a strategic move to attract independent voters and sectors dissatisfied with the current healthcare system, whose discontent is growing as premium costs increase.
The backdrop: Imminent price hikes and endangered subsidies
Trump's rhetorical offensive comes at a time of uncertainty for millions of Americans.
Federal subsidies for health insurance premiums provided under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) will expire at the end of this year.
If a legislative solution is not approved before 2026, healthcare costs could skyrocket, particularly impacting middle-class and working families.
This has reopened the debate on how to redesign the healthcare system, which for many remains one of the most expensive and unequal in the developed world.
Coincidences with conservative lawmakers
Trump's proposal is not alone.
Republican Senator Bill Cassidy, chairman of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, introduced a plan this week that bears similarities to Trump's vision.
Cassidy suggests redirecting the funds currently allocated to insurers to consumers, giving them greater control over their healthcare.
"Who wouldn't want to spend 100% of their money on the medical care that the patient chooses, instead of having 100% go to insurance companies and 80% spent on medical care... and that care being what the insurance company decides you need?" the senator asked.
Although her plan is still under development, Cassidy expressed confidence that it can garner support from both conservatives and moderate sectors of the Democratic Party.
An unexpected turn in the Republican narrative
Historically, the Republican Party has sought to dismantle the ACA system implemented under the administration of Barack Obama, but without providing a clear alternative that enjoys consensus.
Now, with Trump returning to the center of the political stage, the narrative seems to be shifting towards a model that blends individual control, cuts to corporations, and populist rhetoric.
This new approach could pose a direct threat to the powerful health insurance industry, whose profits have surged in recent years.
As Trump himself pointed out, "the actions [of the insurers] have risen by more than a thousand percent in a short period of time. They are bringing in hundreds of billions of dollars, and they are not reinvesting it as they should."
Trump's statements raise more questions than concrete answers.
How would a system without insurance companies actually work? What guarantees would citizens have to access affordable healthcare without a clear regulatory framework? Who would manage the payments and oversee the funds?
Donald Trump's frontal attack on the health insurance business marks a turning point in the political debate over health care in the United States.
Although their proposals still lack a solid technical structure, the message resonates with a citizenry weary of high premiums, endless bureaucracy, and exorbitant corporate benefits.
Filed under: