Related videos:
The great Cuban master Lázaro Bruzón ironically reflected on the supposed requirements to be considered a "credible" opponent in a post that questions the criteria and divisions within the critical spectrum against the Cuban government.
In his message, published on Facebook, this Saturday the 28th, Bruzón raised a series of questions directed at those who —according to his stance— claim the authority to define who qualifies as a legitimate opponent, addressing topics such as political affiliations, ideological positions, participation in structures of the Cuban system, and forms of activism.
The prominent chess player questioned whether past actions, such as having ties to official organizations, participating in public events, or even sympathizing with historical figures of the establishment, could invalidate that status in the present.
"If someone said 'pioneers for communism, we will be like Che,' does that already prevent you from receiving the title?" he questioned rhetorically. And in another part of his text, he added: "Those of us who sinned at some point and went to a May Day parade [...] do we have the option to aspire to the coveted award?"
It also raised questions about the necessity of taking specific positions on issues such as political reforms, economic models, or change strategies, highlighting the diversity —and fragmentation— of opinions within the opposition.
He also addressed the situation of Cuban emigrants, pondering whether those who left the country through legal means or those who began to voice criticisms in recent years would fit within the more demanding standards.
"How many things do we need to be anti? How many things do we need to be pro? How many parties do we need to be affiliated with? Those of us who are not affiliated with any, do we qualify?" questioned the athlete, who has been living outside of Cuba since 2018.
At the end of his message, he identified himself as “a simple Cuban who wants freedom, democracy, and a free and prosperous Cuba where all Cubans belong.”
The post generated multiple reactions on the network, where several users agreed on the lack of clear criteria and criticized extreme positions that, in their view, exclude potential critical voices.
Others emphasized that the only requirement should be the desire for changes in Cuba, while some appealed to unity and leaving ideological differences behind in pursuit of a common goal.
The statement comes to light weeks after Bruzón, currently residing in the U.S., reiterated his criticisms of the Cuban political system, which he blames for the country's deterioration since 1959, when it plunged the people into “a big mess”.
The line of public statements that he has maintained since leaving the Island positions the multi-awarded chess player as one of the critical voices against the Cuban regime, closely followed on social media.
Filed under: