The wars for the independence of Cuba

Maceo Park, in Central Havana.Photo © CiberCuba

A nation is not born solely when it proclaims its independence. A nation begins to exist much earlier, when a people develops self-awareness, when it recognizes a shared history, its own culture, and a common destiny. It is born when men and women are willing to make sacrifices in the name of a higher ideal: freedom.

For nearly four centuries, Cuba was part of the Spanish Empire. However, throughout the 19th century, a more defined national sentiment began to develop on the Island. Cuban criollos stopped seeing themselves solely as inhabitants of a colony and began to recognize themselves as members of a community with their own interests, aspirations, and issues.

Cuban independence was not a sudden event nor a decision made impulsively. It was the result of decades of intellectual evolution, political conflicts, accumulated frustrations, and a growing national consciousness.

Before the Cuban fields were filled with combatants, the Island had already engaged in a profound battle of ideas about its future. Throughout that long process, various political currents emerged, attempting to answer the same question: what should be Cuba's destiny?

Three significant stages marked the path to independence: the Ten Years' War (1868-1878), the subsequent period known as the Fertile Truce (1878-1895), and the Necessary War organized by José Martí, which began in 1895.

Those wars were not only attempts to break the colonial bond with Spain. They were also the stage where the modern Cuban nation began to be built.

The ideas that prepared for independence

Before Carlos Manuel de Céspedes proclaimed the beginning of the armed struggle in 1868, Cuba had been experiencing an intense political and intellectual debate for decades. Cuban society did not have a unified vision for the future of the Island. Economic, social, and political differences gave rise to various schools of thought that profoundly influenced the 19th century.

Reformism was one of the first organized expressions of Cuban discontent. Its supporters did not initially advocate for separation from Spain, but rather for the urgent need for profound reforms within the colonial system: greater political participation, economic freedom, the elimination of administrative abuses, and a fairer relationship between Cuba and the metropolis.

Within this movement, essential figures such as Félix Varela and José Antonio Saco stood out, as they significantly contributed to the development of a distinct Cuban identity. Their ideas helped to understand that the interests of the Island were beginning to diverge profoundly from those of the Spanish colonial government.

Autonomism later emerged as a more structured political proposal. Its supporters argued that Cuba should have its own institutions, internal governance capacity, and greater freedoms, while maintaining ties with Spain. For many years, it represented an intermediate alternative for significant sectors of Cuban society between traditional colonialism and complete independence.

Annexationism, particularly influential during the 1840s and 1850s, advocated for the incorporation of Cuba into the United States. Its supporters believed that this option could provide political stability and economic development. However, this movement faced significant contradictions, including the debate over the preservation of Cuban identity and the existing differences among the interests of its proponents.

Finally, the independence movement was consolidating as the current that advocated for the definitive separation from Spain and the creation of a sovereign nation. It did not emerge spontaneously. It grew as a consequence of the lack of meaningful reforms, the rigidity of the colonial system, and the strengthening of an increasingly defined Cuban national identity.

These currents were not static. Many individuals changed their political positions as events unfolded. Some reformists and autonomists eventually became convinced that independence was the only viable path given the colonial system's inability to meet the aspirations of Cuban society.

The war that began in 1868 was not just an armed rebellion. It was the consequence of decades of thought, debate, and the quest for a national destiny. Before fighting for freedom on the battlefield, Cuba had started to fight for it in the realm of ideas.

The Cry of Yara: When the Will to be Free was Born

October 10, 1868

On the morning of October 10, 1868, at the La Demajagua sugar mill, owned by Carlos Manuel de Céspedes, a new chapter in the history of Cuba began. Céspedes, from a Creole family of sugar plantation owners, understood that the aspirations for change could no longer wait. There he proclaimed the start of the fight against Spanish rule and presented the document known as the Manifesto of the Revolutionary Assembly of the Island of Cuba, where he outlined the political and moral reasons for the uprising.

But that act had a much deeper significance. Céspedes not only declared independence as a political aspiration; he also granted freedom to his slaves and called upon them to join the struggle. With that gesture, he connected two great historical objectives: national emancipation and the abolition of slavery.

The uprising that began in La Demajagua quickly spread through the East and marked the start of the Ten Years' War, the first major Cuban independence war.

It was a struggle marked by enormous difficulties: a lack of resources, internal divisions, organizational problems, and a powerful Spanish military response. However, it had a decisive consequence: it created the historical figure of the mambí, a symbol of sacrifice, resistance, and the will for independence. In the battlefields, men of different social backgrounds began to come together: peasants, former slaves, Creole landowners, and young revolutionaries.

The war began to transform Cuban society. The nation was starting to forge itself amidst sacrifice.

The defeat that was not a defeat: The Zanjón Pact and the Baraguá Protest

After ten years of confrontations, sacrifices, and human losses, the Ten Years' War reached a stage of exhaustion. The independence movement faced serious difficulties: a lack of resources, divisions among revolutionary leaders, regional differences, and the absence of a sufficiently organized political structure weakened the capacity to continue the fight.

Under those conditions, in February 1878, the Pacto del Zanjón was signed, an agreement that ended the armed conflict without achieving the main objective for which thousands of Cubans had fought: independence.

Spain offered some political reforms, greater liberties, and the commitment to move towards the abolition of slavery. However, for many patriots, those concessions were insufficient, as they did not meet the fundamental aspiration of building a sovereign Cuba.

The war had ended militarily, but the independence movement had not disappeared. It was then that one of the most significant episodes in Cuban history took place. General Antonio Maceo refused to accept a peace that did not include independence. On March 15, 1878, in Mangos de Baraguá, he held a meeting with Spanish representatives and expressed the eastern fighters' refusal to accept an agreement that they deemed contrary to the sacrifices made over the past decade.

The Protest of Baraguá became a symbol of national dignity. That moment demonstrated that, even though the war had been lost on the military front, the idea of independence remained alive in the consciousness of a significant part of the Cuban people. History had imparted a deep lesson: freedom could not be achieved solely through courage and sacrifice. It also required political organization, unity of purpose, and leadership capable of overcoming internal divisions.

The Fertile Truce: A War of Ideas and Preparation

The period between 1878 and 1895 was known as the Fertile Truce. It was not a time of true tranquility. Although the rifles had temporarily fallen silent, Cuba continued to experience intense political, intellectual, and social struggles. During these years, independence groups were reorganized, new debates about the future of the Island emerged, and a new generation of Cubans began to prepare to continue the work initiated in 1868.

The experience of the first war had shown that a new insurrection would require more than revolutionary enthusiasm. It would be essential to have an organization capable of uniting former combatants and new patriots under a common project. This was also a period of profound social transformations. The definitive abolition of slavery in 1886 altered the Cuban economic and social structure, although it did not eliminate the inequalities inherited from the colonial system. Thus, Cuban society was entering a new historical phase, where the ideas of citizenship, equality, and nation were gaining increasing importance. In this context emerged the figure who would unite political thought, historical experience, and revolutionary organization: José Martí.

José Martí and the Necessary War: Independence as a Nation-Building Project

February 24, 1895

The new independentist phase found its main political architect in José Martí. Martí understood that Cuba could not repeat the mistakes made during the Ten Years' War. The new struggle had to transcend regionalism, internal divisions, and the lack of coordination that had weakened the first conflict.

For him, independence was not only about expelling the Spanish colonial power. It was about creating a new republic, founded on democratic principles, social justice, civic participation, and respect for human dignity. In 1892, he founded the Cuban Revolutionary Party, a political organization aimed at preparing for war while simultaneously laying the foundations for the future republic.

Martí managed to unite veterans of the Ten Years' War, such as Máximo Gómez and Antonio Maceo, with a new generation of young revolutionaries. The military experience of the former fighters combined with a new political vision. On February 24, 1895, the uprising traditionally known as the Grito de Baire began.

Although Baire became a symbol of the beginning of the war, the movement was much broader and included simultaneous uprisings in different areas of the country, especially in the East. Martí referred to this struggle as the Necessary War because he believed that Cuba had reached the limits of reform possibilities within the colonial system. However, his conception was very clear: this war should not be a war of hatred against Spain or against the Spaniards residing in Cuba. It should be a fight for freedom and for the foundation of a nation where everyone could coexist under the law.

His ideal was summarized in one of his most famous political expressions: “With all and for the good of all.” This phrase was not just a moral call. It was the synthesis of a republican project based on inclusion, national unity, and the rejection of any form of domination.

Martí understood that political independence would only make sense if it led to a truly free republic.

The organization of the new war

An essential difference between the war that began in 1868 and the one in 1895 was the level of preparation achieved by the revolutionary movement. The new conflict had an organized civil leadership, a defined political strategy, and highly experienced military leaders. The Cuban Revolutionary Party had managed to establish a support network both inside and outside the island, particularly among the Cuban emigration in the United States, where Martí carried out intensive organizational and propaganda work.

The war was no longer just a spontaneous uprising. It was a project prepared over many years. However, the conflict would come at a tremendous human cost. Martí himself, who had tirelessly worked for independence, fell in battle on May 19, 1895, in Dos Ríos. His death represented an irreplaceable loss for the Cuban revolution, but his ideas continued to inspire the struggle.

Military leadership then fell into the hands of figures like Máximo Gómez and Antonio Maceo, who would take on the responsibility of advancing the military campaign.

The invasion and the maturation of the independence movement

One of the major differences between the Ten Years' War and the Necessary War was the level of organization achieved by the revolutionary movement of 1895. The first war had demonstrated the courage of the Cuban people, but it also revealed their weaknesses: internal divisions, lack of political coordination, and the absence of a national strategy that could transform regional struggle into a truly island-wide movement.

The new independentist generation learned from those mistakes. Now there was an organized political leadership, represented by the Cuban Revolutionary Party, and an experienced military leadership capable of conducting a war on a larger scale.

After the death of José Martí in Dos Ríos, military leadership was primarily in the hands of Máximo Gómez and Antonio Maceo. Both represented the historical continuity of the struggle that began in 1868. Máximo Gómez brought his extraordinary military experience and strategic ability. Antonio Maceo symbolized discipline, courage, and the steadfast defense of the independence ideal.

One of the greatest military achievements of this period was the Eastern to Western Invasion Campaign, an operation aimed at bringing the war to all of Cuban territory. The invasion began in 1895 under the leadership of Gómez and Maceo. Its goal was to demonstrate that independence was not merely an aspiration of the eastern provinces, but a national cause.

The liberating army crossed the Island facing enormous difficulties: long marches, diseases, lack of resources, and strong resistance from the Spanish army. Nevertheless, the campaign managed to extend the war to the western regions, where the economic core of colonial power was located, especially the sugar industry.

The invasion held significant political and military meaning. Cuba was no longer portrayed as a rebellious colony confined to certain regions. The independence movement demonstrated that there was an organized national will to achieve sovereignty. The war had entered a new dimension. Cuba was now a nation in arms.

The Spanish response: Total war

The expansion of the independence movement provoked a much more intense military reaction from Spain than during the Ten Years' War. The Spanish government sent large military contingents to the Island under the command of General Valeriano Weyler, who implemented a strategy aimed at separating the civilian population from the revolutionary army.

The policy of reconcentración, initiated in 1896, forced hundreds of thousands of peasants to abandon their homes and concentrate in areas controlled by colonial authorities. This measure led to a deep humanitarian crisis: hunger, disease, and a high number of civilian casualties. The war ceased to be merely a clash between armies. The Cuban population found itself caught in the midst of an increasingly destructive struggle.

The conflict took on an international dimension. The situation in Cuba began to attract increasing attention in the United States and other countries, particularly due to the severity of the humanitarian crisis and the economic and strategic interests linked to the Island.

The U.S. intervention of 1898 and the end of Spanish rule

At the end of the 19th century, Spain faced enormous difficulties in maintaining its control over Cuba. The war had weakened its military and economic resources, while the independence movement continued to gain ground. In 1898, the explosion of the American battleship USS Maine in the port of Havana accelerated the crisis between the United States and Spain.

Following the declaration of war by the United States, American intervention in the Cuban conflict began. The defeat of Spain led to the signing of the Treaty of Paris in 1898, through which Spain relinquished its sovereignty over Cuba. After nearly four centuries of Spanish colonial rule, the Island was reaching the end of that historical period. However, the outcome did not unfold exactly as many independence supporters had envisioned.

Cubans had fought for decades for a sovereign republic, but the U.S. intervention introduced a new political reality that would shape the birth of the Cuban state. Independence had been achieved, but the establishment of a fully sovereign and democratic republic remained a pending challenge.

The historical significance of the wars of independence

The Cuban wars of the 19th century were much more than a series of military uprisings. They were the historical process through which the essential foundations of Cuban national identity were defined. Several decisive elements were consolidated during this period: the idea of Cuba as an independent nation; the integration of various social sectors around a common project; the connection between national independence and the abolition of slavery; the emergence of the mambí as a symbol of sacrifice, resistance, and patriotism; and the formation of a distinct political thought, particularly represented by José Martí.

But this long journey was also marked by enormous tragedies. Thousands of Cubans died in combat, and many more fell victim to hunger, disease, and the violence of war. Entire families were destroyed, and a whole generation was marked by sacrifice. Independence was achieved after thirty years of struggle, but the dream of building a stable, free, and democratic republic was just beginning.

Historical balance: A nation born from sacrifices and hopes

Between the cry of Carlos Manuel de Céspedes in La Demajagua and the Guerra Necesaria, organized by José Martí, nearly three decades of struggle unfolded. During this time, Cuba learned to fight, but it also grasped a fundamental lesson: freedom does not solely depend on the heroism of the men and women who defend it. A free nation requires strong institutions, respect for the law, civic participation, and a political culture capable of preserving the ideals for which it fought.

The wars of independence were the great historical school where Cuba began to define itself as a nation. They were not merely wars against an empire. They were the painful birth of a homeland. They were the expression of a people who, after centuries of colonial rule, decided to take on the right to build their own destiny.

Related videos:

Filed under:

Opinion piece: Las declaraciones y opiniones expresadas en este artículo son de exclusiva responsabilidad de su autor y no representan necesariamente el punto de vista de CiberCuba.