"How can you be so treacherous?": Mexican woman reproaches Latinos who voted for Trump, sparking a viral debate

The viral video of Zero Kitkat on TikTok questions Latinos who supported Trump, sparking a debate about identity and racism. Thousands of users are commenting, reflecting cultural tensions in the U.S.


A video by creator Zero Kitkat, published on TikTok, has sparked intense debate and gone viral, garnering thousands of comments and more than 70,000 "likes" in just a few days. In her reflection, the young Mexican strongly questions Latinos who supported former President Donald Trump, labeling this support as a "betrayal of their roots" and bringing issues of identity and discrimination to the forefront.

The creator begins the video by quoting phrases she has heard from other Latinos, such as: "It's great that Trump won, because as a Latina, I would have voted for him too if I could." With an emphatic tone, Zero addresses those who justify the former president's immigration policies: "I can't wrap my head around how you can be a person like me, with a cactus on your face, and support someone who clearly despises us."

In another part of his reflection, he highlights the implications of systemic racism and emphasizes his disappointment towards Latinos who, after legalizing their immigration status, forget their roots: "They completely forget where they come from. It's as if they think that by voting for Trump they will be treated as equals, and that's not the case."

The post has generated hundreds of comments on TikTok, where users have reacted intensely. One user stated, "I thought my algorithm had betrayed me, but I'm glad I watched it until the end," while another confessed, "I was getting frustrated at the beginning, but now I fully agree with you." Some users emphasized the importance of the message, like one who wrote, "Zero will always be my safe space; they spoke pure truth." However, criticism was not absent. One commentator pointed out, "Trump is not racist; he is just enforcing the law."

Many users also took the opportunity to reflect on the perception of Latinos in the United States. One person expressed: "They think they have some kind of privilege for being legal, but to them, you'll always be someone with a cactus on your face." Another added: "The worst enemy of a Mexican is another Mexican who feels like a gringo." Some even approached the topic with humor: "I almost wrote you a whole book, but I watched the entire video and calmed down."

The tone of Zero, direct and emotional, did not go unnoticed. "You are absolutely right; it’s a betrayal to forget where you come from," someone remarked, while another assured, "It’s incredible how Latinos think that by supporting Trump, they will be treated as equals." There were also those who reflected on the impact on the migrant community: "Literally, because of a few, all Latinos are paying the consequences."

The video shared on their TikTok profile @zerokitkat has brought sensitive topics such as racism, discrimination, and the cultural identity of Latinos in the United States to the forefront. Beyond its impact on TikTok, this discussion reflects a broader phenomenon: the tension that migrants face between their roots and the desire to fit into their new country.

The viral nature of this young woman's controversial reflection, who lives in Monterrey, confirms the power of social media to spark crucial debates, especially in communities grappling with inequalities and discrimination. Zero Kitkat has not only generated conversation but has also prompted deep reflection among Latinos about their role in American society.

Frequently Asked Questions about the Viral Debate on Latino Support for Trump

Why did Zero Kitkat's video about Latinos who voted for Trump generate so much debate?

The Zero Kitkat video sparked debate as it emphatically questioned the identity and political decisions of Latinos who supported Donald Trump, labeling it as "treason to their roots." It raised sensitive topics such as systemic racism and cultural identity, resonating with many users on TikTok and prompting a reflection on the perception of Latinos in the United States.

What are the main criticisms of Latinos who support Trump according to the debate on social media?

Critics focus on the idea that by supporting Trump, Latinos would be forgetting their roots and the implications of immigration policies deemed discriminatory. They are accused of seeking acceptance while ignoring that they will never be treated as equals by sectors that have historically been exclusive. Many believe that this support is a denial of cultural identity and a lack of solidarity with other migrants.

How does the historical and social context influence the perception of Latinos in the U.S.?

The historical and social context significantly influences this, as the United States is a country built by immigrants from diverse cultures. The perception of Latinos is shaped by discrimination and systemic racism, which creates internal tensions regarding identity and belonging. Furthermore, immigration policies and political rhetoric affect how they see themselves and how they are perceived by others.

What impact does the use of social media platforms like TikTok have on discussions about identity and politics among Latinos in the U.S.?

Social media platforms, such as TikTok, have a significant impact by allowing debates on identity and politics to go viral, reaching a broad audience. They facilitate the expression of diverse opinions and reflection on sensitive issues, such as discrimination and cultural identity, promoting discussions that can influence public perception and the social awareness of migrant communities.

Filed under:

CiberCuba Editorial Team

A team of journalists committed to reporting on Cuban current affairs and topics of global interest. At CiberCuba, we work to deliver truthful news and critical analysis.

CiberCuba Editorial Team

A team of journalists committed to reporting on Cuban current affairs and topics of global interest. At CiberCuba, we work to deliver truthful news and critical analysis.