A tense exchange about Cuba on an Argentine political debate program has once again highlighted the profound disconnect between certain ideological discourses abroad and the reality that millions of Cubans experience on the Island.
The debate, broadcast on the YouTube channel BorderPeriodismo, brought together Francisco Escolar, an Argentine leftist activist, and Roberto Bouli, an artist and dance teacher who lived in Cuba until the age of 28.
From the outset, the exchange revealed two completely opposing views regarding the situation in the Caribbean nation.
While Escolar insisted on holding the United States and Donald Trump accountable for the Cuban crisis, Bouli firmly responded, drawing on his personal experience.
In one of the most striking moments of the exchange, the Cuban clearly stated his position: "Don't blame the United States, my brother... I am Cuban and I have my family there," a phrase that quickly went viral and was celebrated by many users on social media.
The Argentinean, for his part, stated that the U.S. embargo is the main cause of precarious conditions in Cuba, even going so far as to claim that Washington "is violating the human rights of the Cuban people" and that it keeps the country without energy or basic resources.
However, Bouli dismantled that argument by appealing to direct experience, which set the tone for the debate.
"Don't come to me talking about human rights or international politics, talk to me about Cuba... you can't speak about Cuba because you didn't live there. You don't know anything about Cuba," he emphasized.
The Cuban also addressed a particularly sensitive issue: the repression within the country.
In a testimony that heightened the tension, he stated: "I, as a Cuban citizen, while in Cuba, if I do not agree with the government of Cuba, do you know what they do to me? They make me disappear, just like thousands of Cubans have disappeared."
Throughout the debate, Bouli insisted that the root of the Cuban problem lies not outside, but within the political system established since 1959.
He asserted that the country has been invaded since Fidel Castro arrived in '59, when prosperity ended and a system was established that restricts basic freedoms and conditions the lives of its citizens, beyond any external factors.
The Argentine, on the other hand, directed the debate towards a frontal critique of Trump, whom he labeled as a pedophile and compared to Hitler, even expressing concerns about a possible U.S. intervention in Cuba.
This stance was quickly challenged by Bouli, who rejected that narrative and deemed it disconnected from the reality of the country. "First of all, you’re not a clairvoyant; what the United States will do with Cuba, you don’t even know, starting from there," he noted.
The exchange, far from being just a television crossover, revealed a broader fracture: that which exists between those who analyze Cuba from a political theory or ideological activism perspective, and those who have directly experienced the consequences of the system on the Island.
On social media, the video has generated thousands of reactions. Many support the Cuban's intervention, highlighting the importance of listening to those who have personally suffered from the situation in the country. Others, however, defend the Argentine's stance, keeping the focus on U.S. foreign policy.
Beyond the positions, this moment has highlighted a recurring discussion in Latin America: who has the authority to speak about Cuba and from what perspective the narratives about its crisis are constructed.
Filed under: