A philosophical and political exchange on the nature of the Cuban exile was one of the highlights of the weekly discussion on Thursday at CiberCuba, when writers and analysts Frank Rodríguez, Camilo Venegas, and Jorge de Armas, moderated by Tania Costa, debated whether exile is an exemplary behavior or merely an imposed condition—and whether political prisoners are obligated to behave like permanent heroes.
The debate has a specific backdrop: the criticisms that certain sectors have directed against Luis Manuel Otero Alcántara since his arrival in Miami in July, questioning his physical appearance, his statements, and the conditions he has described regarding his incarceration and his release before going into exile.
Frank Rodríguez took a stance from the beginning: "Exile is a behavior, it's an attitude towards life, towards the homeland you lost. If it's not behavior, then what is exile?"
For Rodríguez, behavior is not limited to visible action. "For me, behavior also includes thought that leads to action, of course."
However, he acknowledged the historical limits of that attitude. "Unfortunately, the degree of freedom we have been able to exercise in changing the regime in Cuba has been very limited. Due to historical circumstances, our Latin American brothers have not helped us, nor do we have that level of influence in the United States."
Journalist and analyst Jorge de Armas was more incisive in pointing out the contradiction of those who demand exemplary behavior from political prisoners. From the outset of the discussion, he issued an ironic warning: “Good afternoon as well to all those who are determined to sustain Castroism from exile. A special greeting to them.”
Then he became more direct: "There is a horde of cedistas in exile whose only way of being anti-Castro is by being more Castroist than the Castroists and denouncing, humiliating, and insulting the political prisoners who return."
De Armas resorted to irony laden with symbolism to describe those demands. "When they say that exile is behavior, what are they saying? They used to tell me it was bad for me to get lost in the classrooms. They said, Jorge, we're going to send you to a behavior school." In Cuba, "behavior schools" are detention centers for minors, equivalent to reform schools.
The analyst also appealed to gratitude as an argument. "It really bothers me that regarding the struggle of political prisoners, who are the ones who took to the streets—something none of us did in Cuba—we are so ungrateful, so wicked, and so un-Cuban."
For his part, the writer Camilo Venegas flatly rejected the idea that former prisoners should serve as permanent moral models: "I don't think so; no one has to be an example for anyone."
To support his position, Venegas quoted an idea attributed to the writer Arturo Pérez-Reverte: "The heroes, most of the heroes in history, were heroes for 15 minutes, 20 minutes, a day, a week, a month, but they weren't heroes for much longer."
Otero Alcántara himself responded to his critics on August 8, denying that he was "whitewashing" the regime and urging that attention be focused on the more than 1,200 political prisoners still held on the island.
Jorge de Armas also mentioned the case of Félix Navarro —who remains incarcerated in Agüica prison in Matanzas, where he was beaten and sent to a punishment cell in April— as a warning of what could happen when other former prisoners arrive in exile and are subjected to the same scrutiny.
Filed under: