The Cuban regime resorted once again to public humiliation as a means of control.
Days after a video showed an elderly woman from the village of El Cobre confronting Miguel Díaz-Canel about the loss of her bed following Hurricane Melissa, the woman appeared in a new recording in which she expressed herself calmly, gratefully, and praised the so-called "revolution" and the figure of Fidel Castro.
"I thank that beautiful revolution and Commander Fidel, who is in that stone and is still alive," said the elderly woman, identified as Francisca, with an exalted tone typical of those who know they are under the scrutiny of the authorities of a totalitarian and relentless regime.
The scene, shared on Facebook by the first secretary of the Communist Party in Granma, Yudelkis Ortiz Barceló, recalled the worst methods of political manipulation: an elderly, fragile woman positioned in front of a communist leader who acts as a master of ceremonies, correcting, guiding, and “reminding” the correct answers.
With a clear intention to rehabilitate the image of the first secretary of the PCC, Ortiz Barceló asked Francisca if she had been visited by the authorities, insisting that her home was inspected "just like everyone else's" and turning what should have been an act of humanitarian assistance into a session of ideological correction.
"Manipulation is a grotesque way to divide," wrote Ortiz Barceló upon posting the video on his social media, attempting to justify what is clearly a forced retraction.
Francisca was the unwitting protagonist of one of the most talked-about scenes in recent days: the moment during an official tour when she approached the Cuban leader to demand the return of her bed.
"We don’t have a bed," shouted the woman amid the crowd. Díaz-Canel, visibly irritated, responded: "And I don’t have one to give you right now either." The phrase, recorded by neighbors and shared on social media, sparked a wave of outrage both within and outside the country, highlighting the moral chasm between a fortified ruler and a devastated populace in just a few seconds.
The regime's response was not to acknowledge the lack of empathy or tension from the First Secretary of the Communist Party of Cuba (PCC), but rather to reconstruct the narrative.
First, the official program 'Chapeando Bajito' provided a "clarification" based solely on a written transcript, without showing the original video, claiming media manipulation.
And now, the very secretary of the PCC in Granma appeared on camera alongside the woman who confronted the leader of the so-called “continuity,” transformed into a compliant symbol of repentance.
The control circle closes: the State fabricates its own version of events and disseminates it as truth.
Francisca's video is part of a recent series of staged events that the regime has orchestrated to counteract the rising social unrest.
Just a few weeks ago, Yudelkis Ortiz Barceló herself showcased the detained mother Mayelín Carrasco Álvarez, who also appeared "remorseful" for protesting in Río Cauto.
In October, the State Security forced the pediatrician Erlis Sierra Gómez to read a script of repentance in front of a camera, after being arrested for participating in a peaceful demonstration in Baire.
The three cases —a doctor, a mother, an elderly woman— reveal the same pattern of subjugation: the doctrine of fear in audiovisual format.
The mechanism is sinister in its simplicity. First, the power suppresses any spontaneous manifestation of dissent. Then, following public condemnation, it seeks to erase the dignity of the dissident through a “confession” or “thank you” recorded under surveillance.
The retraction becomes a forced purification ceremony, designed to disable popular solidarity and reinstall obedience. The victim ceases to be a subject of rights and instead becomes a lesson: the citizen who made a mistake, repented, and was forgiven by the State.
Nothing in Francisca's video suggests spontaneity. Her elevated tone, the timbre of her voice, and her insistence on thanking "that beautiful revolution" evoke more intimidation than conviction.
There is no relief in her gaze, only resignation. The staging, also published by a political authority, seeks not to clarify anything but to neutralize the symbolic damage caused by the president's response. The propaganda attempts to replace empathy with obedience, shame with discipline.
In any democracy, the plea of an elderly woman who lost her bed would be met with respect and immediate action. In Cuba, that plea becomes an ideological offense.
The propaganda machinery does not tolerate cracks, not even those opened by pain. That’s why Francisca’s voice was corrected, reeducated, and returned to the screen as an example of loyalty. The State did not provide her with a bed, but demanded her submission.
Behind that image of remorse lies a message directed at the entire country: no one can challenge power without paying a price. Today it was a retired teacher; tomorrow it could be anyone who dares to claim what is rightfully theirs.
The regime does not fear criticism; it fears the example. And when the dignity of the most humble becomes a threat, the system responds with its most cowardly weapon: public ridicule.
The voice of Francisca, though tamed by propaganda, has already been heard. Her first act—raising her voice before the president—belongs to the truth. What followed belongs to fear.
But fear, like all authoritarian constructs, has an expiration date. And although the regime tries to rewrite its history with videos and slogans, the images of an elderly woman demanding a bed will continue to resonate as what they are: an act of courage in a country that punishes courage.
Filed under:
