The Cuban regime assured this Tuesday that it had delivered to Interpol its "National Terrorist List", which includes important figures from exile in Miami,influencers and social communicators.
The government portalCubadebate He said that the Ministry of the Interior (MININT) sent "to the International Criminal Police Organization, better known as Interpol, the Resolution of the Ministry of the Interior that appeared in the Official Gazette of December 7, 2023."
Likewise, he emphasized that the police entity, of which 196 countries are part, "received" the "National List of people and entities that have been subjected to criminal investigations and are wanted by the Cuban authorities."
Cubadebate, spokesperson for the regime, stated that this list "includes people who, since 1999, have committed terrorist acts, inside or outside the country, affecting citizens or property," those who "have attempted the life of the president of the Republic or other State officials" and those who have "incited, organized or financed actions that go against peace and citizen security."
All the classified as "terrorists" by the Cuban regime They live in the United States, especially in Florida, with the exception of one person residing in Belgium.
The list, of 61 people and 19 entities that Havana accuses of sponsoring terrorism in Cuba, includes several investigative files and came out in response to the inclusion of Cuba in the list of countries sponsoring terrorism that the United States publishes each year.
In addition to the names of the old Cuban exile who have historically been attacked by the regime, the list includes, among others, the opponents Eliecer Ávila, Liudmila Santiesteban Cruz, Manuel Milanés Pizonero, and the influencers Alain Lambert Sánchez (Cuban paparazzi), Jorge Ramón Batista Calero (Ultrack) and Alexander Otaola Casal.
After publishing the list in December of last year, Havanathreatened to extradite and prosecute in absentia to the citizens included in it.
Many Cubans included in the list responded to the regime that this measure will not mean for them a change in their intention tocomplaint against arbitrariness of the government.
What do you think?
SEE COMMENTS (3)Filed in: