
Related videos:
An article published on Cubadebate regarding recent statements by Marco Rubio, the Secretary of State of the United States, triggered a wave of responses on social media, where Cubans questioned the stance of the official media.
The article, originally a post on Facebook by user Orestes Hernández Hernández, who works at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the island (MINREX), rejects Rubio's stance in an interview with Fox News.
"I have no intention of going to Havana with this regime in power, except to discuss when they are going to leave," were the words of the Cuban-American that ignited the anger of the communists in Havana.
But Cubadebate and Hernández Hernández have received strong responses from numerous Cubans, who do not view favorably the communist government criticizing the politician while happily accepting remittances and dollars from the United States.
"They don’t care for him, but they do care about the remittances," commented a user, reflecting the sentiment of many who highlighted the island's economic dependency.
Another internet user commented sarcastically, "Communists don't want Marco Rubio, but they go crazy for the U.S. dollar."
The debate also addressed the lack of freedoms within the country. One comment emphasized: "We don't want you and your criminal leaders either, and you are not leaving," while another requested a poll within Cubadebate to gauge the true opinion of the people on the matter.
The criticisms also pointed to the living conditions in Cuba: "They do not want it, just as they do not want to listen to the people, their voice, their demands, their desires to change everything and move forward a country that was once a COUNTRY," denounced another citizen of the island.
The reactions reveal the discontent of a portion of the population, which not only rejects the approach of the official media, but also calls into question the priorities of the Cuban government amid the economic and social crisis facing the island.
Marco Rubio, a direct rival of dictatorships
Marco Rubio, the first Cuban American to lead U.S. diplomacy, has taken a hardline stance against the Cuban government. In 2016, when he was running for president, he had already stated that he would never travel to Cuba without a regime change, a position he now reaffirms from his role in the U.S. government.
Just a few hours ago, during his visit to Costa Rica, he also stated that he held Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela accountable for the migration crisis in the hemisphere, labeling their governments as "enemies of humanity."
Frequently Asked Questions about Criticisms of the Cuban Regime and Marco Rubio's Stance
Why do Cubans criticize the regime and Cubadebate for their comments about Marco Rubio?
Cubans criticize the regime and Cubadebate because they see a contradiction in the government criticizing Marco Rubio while accepting remittances and dollars from the United States, which support the island's economy. The criticisms highlight Cuba's economic dependency on U.S. dollars and the discontent with government management.
What is Marco Rubio's stance on the Cuban regime?
Marco Rubio has maintained a critical and tough stance towards the Cuban regime. As Secretary of State, he has reaffirmed his intention not to visit Cuba while the regime remains in power, calling it a "disaster" and holding it responsible for the crisis on the island.
What impact could Marco Rubio's policy have on Cuba?
Marco Rubio's policy could mean an increase in sanctions and restrictions towards Cuba, which would pressure the regime and its allies. This could further impact the already weakened Cuban economy and its international relations, at a time of economic and social crisis on the island.
How do Cubans respond to the government's economic measures?
The government's economic measures have been met with rejection from the Cuban people, who criticize the dependence on the dollar and the restrictions impacting the local economy. Reactions on social media reflect dissatisfaction and frustration, with many calling for a change in management.
Filed under: