Sandro Castro, grandson of Fidel Castro known on social media as "El Vampirach", published a new statement on his Instagram account this Monday regarding his initiative to distribute food in Havana: “There is no greater happiness in my heart right now than helping my Cuba.”
The post, accompanied by a video showcasing moments when he distributes food throughout the capital, marks the third installment since he recently published the first video distributing food boxes to vulnerable individuals in the dilapidated streets of the capital.
At that moment, Castro declared: «We are going to bring joy to the hearts of many people», and at the end he added: «this is content that we created from the heart and I invite everyone to join me in helping those in need».
Then, following the positive response from his followers, Castro announced that he would continue and expand the initiative working alongside influencers, individuals from the private sector, and private citizens: "For my Cuba and the Cuba of all of us."
The images of the distribution show rice with vegetables served in Styrofoam containers, with elderly people and children waiting to receive food in front of colonial buildings and palm trees in Havana.
Reactions to Sandro Castro's gesture are largely characterized by support for the act of distributing food to vulnerable individuals. Dozens of users praise the initiative and highlight its immediate impact: “it doesn't matter where it comes from, what matters is the action,” “at least someone ate that day,” or “he’s doing more than many.” Others emphasize the symbolic value of bringing visibility to the crisis: “their faces of sadness and hunger” or “this shows the reality of Cuba.” There are also many encouraging messages: “keep it up,” “blessings,” and “more content like this.”
That support, however, is not entirely uncritical. A part of the comments—fewer in number, but more forceful—questions the intention behind the video. Some users refer to it as a “circus,” “marketing,” or “image laundering,” and doubt the authenticity of the gesture: “feeding someone and posting it online is not helping, it’s using” or “why now and not before?” There is also criticism of the public display of charity: “if it’s genuine, there’s no need to publicize it.”
The political component permeates much of the debate. Many comments, even those acknowledging the action, recall the country's context and the role of the system: “the people do not want crumbs, they want freedom,” “that does not resolve the issue of Cuba,” or “your family caused that hunger.” Others go further and demand a clearer stance: “say ‘down with the dictatorship’” or “help the political prisoners.” Nevertheless, some users separate the individual from their surname: “he didn't choose to be born into that family” or “actions are worth more than blood.”
Overall, the prevailing tone is one of pragmatic support: many Cubans appreciate any concrete help amid the scarcity, although they do not lose sight of the structural background of the problem. As one comment summarized: “whatever the reason, what matters is that those in need receive the benefit.” This blend of gratitude, distrust, and demand reflects both the political polarization and the everyday urgency experienced on the island.
Castro's solidarity initiative takes place in the context of a severe humanitarian crisis in Cuba, marked by extreme food shortages, widespread power outages, and a collapse of transportation due to a lack of fuel.
The grandson of Fidel Castro has been at the center of public debate for months. In March, The New York Times published an extensive profile about him, and in interviews with CNN en Español and NBC, he criticized Díaz-Canel, declared himself "revolutionary yes, communist no," and stated that "the majority of Cubans want capitalism, not communism."
Beyond the controversy surrounding his last name, Sandro Castro's gesture once again highlights a reality that millions of Cubans face daily: the difficulty of accessing something as basic as a meal. The images of elderly people and children receiving food in the streets of Havana, along with the overwhelming reactions, reflect both the immediate impact of the initiative and the depth of a crisis that goes beyond any individual action.
This contrast—between timely aid and the magnitude of the problem—captures much of the debate. For many, it's not just about appreciating the gesture but questioning the root causes that have led to scenes like these becoming commonplace in Cuba. Beyond intentions or interpretations, what remains is an image hard to ignore and an increasingly widespread demand: that the solution should not rely on isolated acts, but on real changes that restore dignity and stability to life on the island.
Filed under: