A federal judge temporarily blocked on Tuesday the Trump administration rule that shortened the deadline for formally admitted refugees to respond to a notice of termination of their immigration status from 30 to 10 days.
The order, issued by Judge Julia E. Kobick of the District of Massachusetts, prohibits the enforcement of that rule until November 6, 2026, inclusive.
The decision came just a day after six refugee advocacy organizations and four individuals filed a class action lawsuit against the rule in the case PANA et al. v. Edlow et al. (Civil Action No. 26-14817-MJJ).
Judge Kobick justified the suspension on the need to preserve the status quo and prevent irreparable harm to the plaintiffs while the district judge assigned to the case considers whether to grant a longer-lasting injunction.
The suspended rule —published by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) on October 14 and signed by the Secretary of Homeland Security Markwayne Mullin— amended federal regulation 8 CFR § 207.9 to shorten the response time to a Notice of Intent to Terminate (NOIT) to ten calendar days, reversing a procedural protection that had been in place for about 45 years.
El estatus migratorio de los refugiados en EE.UU. sigue siendo un tema en constante cambio. Mantente informado con la cobertura de para conocer las últimas decisiones judiciales y normas que pueden afectar a la comunidad.
The court order has two immediate and specific effects.
First, it prohibits DHS, USCIS, and its director Joseph B. Edlow from implementing or enforcing the 10-day rule during the pause.
Second, and of particular importance for those who have already received a notice, the judge ordered that the NOITs issued between October 14 and October 27 that required a response in less than 30 days are suspended: their recipients are not obligated to reply during this period, and the government cannot revoke their refugee status for failing to do so.
In his own words, Kobick ordered that the defendants are "prohibited from terminating the refugee status of those individuals for failing to respond to any notice of intent to terminate issued during that period."
The institutional plaintiffs include Partnership for the Advancement of New Americans (PANA), HIAS, Refugee Council USA, African Communities Together, Jewish Family Service of Western Massachusetts, and International Institute of New England.
The four individual plaintiffs are refugees from Afghanistan, Ethiopia, Colombia, and Iraq. They are represented by Democracy Forward and the International Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP).
In a joint statement, plaintiffs and lawyers stated that "no one should face the threat of losing their legal status and being returned to danger without a meaningful opportunity to defend themselves."
For Cubans, the direct impact of this order is limited but real for a specific subgroup: those who entered the United States formally as refugees under the Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP), retain that status, and received a NOIT between October 14 and 27.
In the fiscal year 2024, 258 Cubans were resettled under USRAP, out of a total of 100,060 refugees admitted to the country; in fiscal year 2025, that number dropped to 128. The vast majority of Cubans in the United States arrived through other means —humanitarian parole, asylum, I-220A, or the Cuban Adjustment Act— which are not directly impacted by this regulation or the judicial suspension.
DHS estimated that about 186,000 cases of refugees admitted between fiscal years 2015 and 2025 who have not yet adjusted their status represent the maximum potential universe subject to the contested rule.
The cancellation of refugee status also results in the immediate loss of employment authorization and may lead to removal proceedings.
It is important to emphasize that the order does not constitute a definitive cancellation of the rule, does not suspend all deportations, and does not automatically extend to parole, asylum, or other immigration categories.
Judge Kobick herself warned that the suspension "is subject to modification, amendment, extension, annulment, or any other appropriate action by the district judge assigned to the case."
The public comment period on the rule remains open until November 13, 2026, via the file USCIS-2026-0397 on Regulations.gov, which will also determine whether the court decides to extend, modify, or lift the suspension before it expires.
Related videos:
Filed under: