Amid the economic, social, and energy crisis that Cuba is experiencing, the ruler Miguel Díaz-Canel once again sparked public outrage with controversial statements during an official tour of the municipality of Esmeralda, in the province of Camagüey.
During a visit to the Aguacate community, Díaz-Canel stated that "even with blackouts, difficulties regarding the family basket, and issues with medications—matters that will not have an immediate solution—there is work being done and positive results in every municipality."
His words were quoted by the official newspaper Adelante. The statement comes in an especially delicate context, as thousands of Cubans endure blackouts lasting over 20 hours a day, chronic shortages of food and medicine, and an inflation that erodes salaries.
The ruler's intervention was interpreted by many as a mockery of the desperate situation facing the people.
Far from announcing concrete measures to alleviate the crisis, Díaz-Canel once again resorted to the empty rhetoric of "resilience" and "creativity," terms he frequently repeats during his visits to the provinces, while the country's decline accelerates.
In his speech, the leader of the regime also mentioned investments in the electric power sector and food production, although he did not provide details on timelines or funding amounts, in a context where Cuba relies almost exclusively on international cooperation and imports to sustain its electric system.
Visit to a mill and hollow promises
As part of the visit, Díaz-Canel toured the rice mill "17 de Mayo," belonging to the Agroindustrial Grain Company "Ruta Invasora." The facility, located in the northern area of Camagüey, processes about 30 tons daily, including the so-called popular rice, sourced from farmers and individual producers.
The tour was part of an exchange with local residents, where the leader supposedly showed interest in issues such as healthcare, the maternal and child program, and sources of employment. However, none of these areas show significant progress.
Cuban television is increasingly shortening Miguel Díaz-Canel's appearances during his visits to towns in Cuba. His words often spark heated controversies on social media at a time of growing social discontent.
Living conditions are deteriorating day by day, while the government insists on presenting a parallel reality where supposed "positive results" justify the lack of real solutions. The regime is disconnected from reality, and its management has failed on all fronts.
Frequently Asked Questions about the Situation in Cuba under Díaz-Canel's Government
What statements did Díaz-Canel make that have sparked outrage in Cuba?
During a tour of the municipality of Esmeralda in Camagüey, Díaz-Canel stated that "even with power outages, difficulties in the family basket, and shortages of medicines, there is work and positive results in every municipality." Many interpreted these words as a mockery of the desperate situation faced by the Cuban people, who endure power outages of over 20 hours daily and a chronic shortage of food and medicines.
How has Díaz-Canel justified the prolonged blackouts in Cuba?
Díaz-Canel has attributed the long blackouts to issues such as the U.S. embargo and internal economic limitations. However, many believe that the government has not provided concrete and immediate solutions to mitigate the energy crisis, instead resorting to future promises and the rhetoric of unity and resistance.
What measures has the Cuban government announced to address the energy crisis?
The government has announced the installation of photovoltaic parks in different regions of the country, with the expectation of contributing over 170 megawatts by mid-year and up to one thousand megawatts by the end of 2025. However, these promises have been met with skepticism by the population, which continues to face extended blackouts and lacks short-term solutions.
How does the crisis in Cuba affect the daily lives of its citizens?
The Cuban population is experiencing a decline in living conditions due to prolonged blackouts, shortages of food and medicine, rampant inflation, and salaries that do not meet basic needs. These challenges have increased social discontent, while the government presents solutions that do not address the urgent needs of the citizens.
Filed under: