President Donald Trump requested this Tuesday that the Supreme Court of the United States authorize his administration to deport migrants to countries that are not their country of origin, such as South Sudan, igniting a wave of criticism from human rights advocates and immigration organizations, reported CNN.
The measure is based on a policy established after Trump's return to power, which allows the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to transfer migrants to “third” countries without prior notification or the opportunity for those affected to claim a risk of persecution, torture, or death in those destinations.
Politics returned to the public eye recently when the administration transferred several detained migrants to South Sudan, a country ravaged by civil war and ethnic violence. According to court records, the detainees had no real opportunity to contest their transfer or to contact their lawyers, as the process occurred outside of regular business hours.
The federal judge Brian Murphy, appointed by the Biden administration, blocked the measure in March, stating that deportation without notification or the right to a defense violates due process. “It was impossible for these individuals to have a meaningful opportunity to contest their transfer to South Sudan”, Murphy asserted in his ruling.
In a recent order, the judge stipulated that officials must provide at least 72 hours' notice to migrants before they are interviewed to claim credible fear, and that those who are not considered at risk will have 15 additional days to attempt to reopen their cases.
The Trump administration responded by elevating the case to the Supreme Court, arguing that the court order poses a threat to U.S. foreign policy and hinders necessary deportations.
In its presentation, the Government stated that it is compelled to choose between keeping the detainees at military facilities abroad, which jeopardizes diplomatic relations, or bringing them back to U.S. territory.
“The country is facing a crisis of illegal immigration, largely because many foreign nationals who most deserve to be expelled are also the most difficult to remove,” noted the Department of Justice in its appeal.
Trump has defended that his policy already includes measures to prevent deported individuals from suffering torture, including alleged "diplomatic assurances" from the receiving countries.
The conflict escalated after CNN reported plans by the Government to send migrants to Libya and Saudi Arabia. The Libyan Ministry of Foreign Affairs denied any agreement with the United States to accept deportations. The First Circuit Court of Appeals also rejected the request to suspend Judge Murphy's order, warning of the risk of "irreparable harm" from wrongful expulsions.
Human rights organizations have warned that this policy would violate international commitments such as the Convention Against Torture, which explicitly prohibits the transfer of individuals to countries where they may be subjected to inhumane treatment.
On May 25th, details emerged about an operation that transported several citizens, including two Cubans, from the U.S. to South Sudan. According to reports, the journey took place on a military flight without the deportees being provided clear information about their final destination or the opportunity to contest the measure.
Sources close to the case stated that the affected Cubans were removed from immigration detention centers during the early morning hours and sent under conditions of isolation, which violates current judicial provisions and international treaties on the protection of vulnerable individuals.
Frequently Asked Questions about Trump's Deportation Policy and South Sudan
Why does Trump want to deport migrants to South Sudan?
Trump seeks to deport migrants to third countries such as South Sudan to avoid keeping them in military facilities abroad or bringing them back to the United States. This measure is part of his immigration policy that allows for deportations without prior notification or the possibility of claiming a risk of persecution in the receiving country.
What criticisms has the policy of deporting migrants to South Sudan received?
Politics has been criticized by human rights organizations for violating due process and compromising the safety of migrants, who do not have the opportunity to oppose their transfer or to contact their lawyers. Furthermore, it is argued that this practice could violate the Convention against Torture by sending individuals to countries where they may face inhumane treatment.
What measures has the Supreme Court taken regarding Trump's deportations?
The Supreme Court has issued orders to suspend deportations based on the Foreign Enemies Act, arguing that due process must be ensured. However, the Trump administration has appealed these decisions, arguing that judicial restrictions interfere with U.S. foreign policy and national security.
What implications does the deportation to South Sudan have for Cuban migrants?
The deportation of Cuban migrants to South Sudan means that they are sent to a country with no personal connections, which can increase their vulnerability to violence and the humanitarian crisis in the region. Furthermore, this practice violates existing judicial provisions and international treaties that protect the rights of migrants.
Filed under:
