A federal judge in Washington D.C. blocked several directives from the Trump administration on Wednesday that authorized the expedited deportation of immigrants benefiting from humanitarian parole, a measure that particularly affected thousands of Cubans, Venezuelans, Haitians, and Nicaraguans.
The judicial decision—issued by Judge Jia Cobb—invalidates three key orders initiated by the Trump administration in its attempt to massively revoke legal protections for migrants who entered legally through the ports of entry under the humanitarian parole program implemented during the presidency of Joe Biden.
The ruling nullifies a memorandum from January 23 that expanded the use of expedited deportation, an order from the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) dated February 18 that authorized the deportation of “foreigners on parole,” and a notice from March 25 that revoked humanitarian parole specifically for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans.
The decision could hinder ICE's efforts to quickly detain and deport migrants who were attending their court appointments, despite having been legally admitted to the country under humanitarian parole.
Only in the case of Cubans, more than 110,000 individuals have been approved under this program, and around 26,000 were at risk of being deported for not having met the one-year presence requirement in the U.S., a necessary condition for regularization under the Cuban Adjustment Act.
The ruling by Judge Cobb comes amidst a broader legal battle over the authority of the Trump administration to cancel humanitarian parole altogether.
An appeals court in Boston is evaluating this week whether the administration acted within its legal authority by revoking the program in a general manner, without individual case analysis.
Meanwhile, the migrant community and legal organizations celebrate the decision made today as a partial victory, which provides relief to thousands of individuals facing imminent deportation.
The ruling represents a legal setback for the immigration plans of former President Trump, who has insisted on tightening measures against immigration even in humanitarian cases.
The future of humanitarian parole, however, still depends on the final decision of the appeals court.
The Trump administration typically elevates these rulings to the Supreme Court, where it has achieved several victories.
Frequently Asked Questions about the Rapid Deportation Ban and Humanitarian Parole
What does the fast deportation blockade mean for immigrants with humanitarian parole?
The fast-track deportation ban means that fast-track deportation orders for immigrants with humanitarian parole have been suspended by a court ruling. This primarily affects Cubans, Venezuelans, Haitians, and Nicaraguans who legally entered the United States under this program. The ruling provides relief to thousands of individuals at risk of imminent deportation, allowing them to attend their court appointments without the immediate threat of being deported.
How does this judicial decision affect Cuban beneficiaries of humanitarian parole?
The judicial decision impacts Cubans by temporarily halting the deportations of those who have not yet met the requirements to regularize under the Cuban Adjustment Act. This law requires that Cubans have lived in the U.S. for at least one year and one day. More than 110,000 Cubans were approved under humanitarian parole, and around 26,000 were at risk of deportation for not meeting this minimum residency time.
What is the future of the humanitarian parole program after this court ruling?
The future of the humanitarian parole program remains uncertain as the case is still in court. Judge Jia Cobb's decision represents a temporary setback for the Trump administration's plans to cancel the program. However, the final outcome will depend on the decision of the appeals court, which will assess whether the administration has the legal authority to terminate the program on a broad scale.
What arguments does the Trump administration use to justify the cancellation of humanitarian parole?
The Trump administration argues that humanitarian parole does not meet the criteria of "significant public benefit" or "urgent humanitarian need." It contends that the program contributes to the collapse of the immigration system and creates logistical pressures, especially at Florida airports. It also claims that parole has been misused and that its cancellation is part of a broader border security strategy.
Filed under: