Related videos:
A survey by Bendixen & Amandi among 600 voters in Miami-Dade reveals a clear message: while 46% approve of Donald Trump's performance, broad majorities reject specific measures from his recent agenda, such as ending TPS for Venezuelans and giving land from Miami Dade College for a presidential library.
According to the data reported by The Miami Herald, which accessed the document published last week, only 35% support eliminating Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Venezuelans, despite nearly half approving of Trump.
The divide is evident even among Republicans: 91% support the president, but only 68% back terminating TPS.
The survey was released following a Supreme Court ruling that re-empowered the Executive to lift that protection.
In leadership roles, Mayor Daniella Levine Cava has a 54% approval rating, surpassing Trump (46%) and DeSantis (47%).
On the other hand, 74% believe that the land next to the Freedom Tower in Miami, donated for Trump’s presidential library, should have remained part of Miami Dade College.
Less than 15% support the transfer to the State for the library. Even 59% of Republicans agree that the plot should remain under the university's control. The transfer was approved in an extraordinary meeting and without public debate, the survey highlights.
Only 40% feel free to express their opinions on social media without fear of repercussions; the sense of freedom is greater among Republicans than among Democrats.
Regarding the use of military force to pressure Nicolás Maduro's departure, 35% are in favor, 42% are against and nearly a quarter are undecided.
Around two-thirds of those surveyed oppose using public funds to subsidize parties of the World Cup in Miami.
The survey (conducted by phone and online) included 36% Republicans and 34% Democrats. The polling firm is working on the campaign of Democrat David Jolly, but claims that this study is not related to that assignment.
What does it reflect?
The survey reflects a gap between overall approval of Trump and the rejection of concrete measures (ending TPS, transfer of MDC land), even within his local Republican base.
There is also a sense of self-censorship in social media (only 4 out of 10 feel free to express their opinions).
The electorate of Miami-Dade distinguishes between Trump as a figure and specific measures: they support his administration in general terms but penalize initiatives perceived as excessive or lacking transparency.
At the same time, a climate of self-censorship on social media and fiscal pragmatism emerges in the face of major sporting events.
Frequently Asked Questions about the Survey in Miami-Dade and the Figure of Donald Trump
What does the survey reveal about support for Donald Trump in Miami-Dade?
The survey shows that, while 46% of Miami-Dade voters approve of Donald Trump's performance, there is a significant rejection of specific measures from his agenda, such as the end of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Venezuelans and the transfer of a parcel of land from Miami Dade College for his presidential library.
What is the stance of Miami-Dade voters on TPS for Venezuelans?
According to the survey, only 35% of voters support the elimination of TPS for Venezuelans, despite a significant proportion of them approving of Trump's overall performance as president.
What do voters think about the land transfer of Miami Dade College?
A substantial majority of 74% of voters in Miami-Dade believes that the land of Miami Dade College should have remained with the university, rather than being transferred for the construction of Trump's presidential library.
Is there freedom of expression on social media according to Miami-Dade voters?
The survey indicates that only 40% of voters feel free to express their opinions on social media without fear of reprisals, reflecting a climate of self-censorship in the community.
How does Donald Trump's figure affect the residents of Miami-Dade?
The figure of Trump generates divided sentiments among residents of Miami-Dade, who generally approve of his administration but reject specific measures from his government that they consider excessive or lacking transparency.
Filed under: