The Cuban project known on social media as El 4tico has once again brought to the forefront one of the most sensitive debates for Cubans both on and off the island: the use of the U.S. embargo as a recurring explanation for all the failures of the socialist model in Cuba.
In a reflection that has generated reactions and comments on digital platforms, the project questions the logic of the official discourse that blames the United States embargo for the lack of well-being, economic stagnation, and social unrest experienced in the country.
According to the analysis, the regime resorts to a counterfactual argument: attributing current problems to something that "would have been worse" if the Government were not in power, a statement that is impossible to verify.
El 4tico raises a key question: what exactly is being embargoed from the Cuban people? The embargo does not prevent Cuba from being socialist, nor from collectivizing the means of production, nor from prioritizing labor over capital.
What the project does limit, however, is access to foreign investment, international trade, and globalization—elements inherent to the capitalist system that the regime itself claims to reject.
From this contradiction arises a deeper critique. The project maintains that the main obstacle to Cuba's development is not external, but internal. It would not be Washington that hinders progress, but rather a power structure that, according to the analysis, "embargoes" individual freedom, creativity, innovation, real democracy, and the critical thinking of citizens.
The message has particularly resonated among Cubans experiencing the daily crisis on the island and among emigrants who question the official narrative. In a context marked by blackouts, inflation, massive migration, and social discontent, reflections such as those from El 4tico reopen the debate on whether the root problem of Cuba is external or, as many are starting to point out, the true embargo is the one that weighs on the freedoms of its own people.
Filed under: