Donald Trump urged Americans to vote in the legislative elections on November 3 as if his name were on the ballot. The response was a severe setback for his party: the Democrats regained control of the Senate, according to projections from the Associated Press, and NBC News and CBS News also projected a Democratic majority in the House of Representatives. Although some recounts are still awaiting closure and certification, the president faces a political upheaval that will alter the final two years of his term.
It was not a defeat concentrated in the most competitive districts. Republicans lost Senate races in Texas, Kansas, South Carolina, North Carolina, Ohio, and Iowa, and also conceded important governorships. The outcome raises questions about the extent to which Trump can transfer his own mobilization ability to the candidates he supports, who have campaigned defending his political agenda.
The Republican map is breaking apart into unimaginable territories
Texas illustrates better than any other state the extent of the impact. James Talarico defeated Republican Ken Paxton in the Senate election, a position that no Democrat had won in the state since 1988. Paxton had the backing of the president. In parallel, Gina Hinojosa defeated Governor Greg Abbott and became the first Latina elected to lead Texas, ending over three decades without a Democratic victory in the governorship.
The night brought two more historic results. In Kansas, Methodist pastor Adam Hamilton defeated Republican Senator Roger Marshall: Democrats had not won a Senate election there since 1932. In South Carolina, pediatrician Annie Andrews triumphed over Darline Graham, the Trump-backed Republican candidate, marking the first victory for her party in that chamber in the state since 1998. These results, included in the summary of Senate gains, exceeded the scenario of a simple loss of marginal seats.
Roy Cooper secured the seat left vacant by Republican Thom Tillis for the Democrats in North Carolina; Sherrod Brown defeated Jon Husted in Ohio, and Josh Turek triumphed over Ashley Hinson in Iowa. In Ohio, moreover, Democrat Amy Acton won the gubernatorial election against Vivek Ramaswamy, a former presidential candidate and Trump ally. This series of defeats spanned various regions, profiles, and positions.
That does not mean that Republicans lost everywhere. In Florida, Byron Donalds won the governorship and Ashley Moody retained the Senate seat previously held by Marco Rubio. In Miami, the race for District 27 between María Elvira Salazar and Eliott Rodríguez remained too close to determine a winner at the time of the available reporting. The national result should be interpreted as a significant Democratic advance, not as a uniform victory in every state or district.
The economy and the war in Iran weigh heavily on the punitive vote
Democratic candidates leveraged the discontent over the cost of living, inflation, the effects of tariffs, and the consequences of the Iran war, issues that defined the campaign. The polls cited by Associated Press reflected widespread dissatisfaction with the state of the economy and a desire for Congress to exert greater checks on the White House. The rising prices of food and fuel became a problem that the president's messages failed to neutralize.
The exit polls released during the day also showed discontent with the performance of the institutions. NBC News recorded a 59% disapproval rating for ICE and a 76% disapproval rating for Congress, in an environment of strong polarization regarding deportations and the functioning of the Government. It cannot be claimed that all Republican losses are due to a single cause: the presidential party usually experiences a decline in midterm elections. However, the scale and geographical distribution of the results indicate a dissatisfaction that transcends local contests.
Reading also presents a challenge for the opposition. Discontent with Trump does not automatically imply an enthusiastic alignment with all the positions of the Democratic Party. The future majority will need to show that it can address the economic concerns that contributed to its rise.
Trump distances himself from an election he sought to personalize
The president turned these elections into a test of mobilizing his supporters. In campaign events, he repeatedly asked them to pretend that he was on the ballot, in order to transfer his electoral appeal to the Republican candidates. However, as defeats multiplied, he wrote on Truth Social that the Republicans would have won "by a landslide" if he had been the candidate. The contrast between both messages highlights the dilemma of a leader who sought to take center stage during the campaign and later tried to distance himself from the outcome.
His subsequent reactions expanded that strategy. Trump held Greg Abbott responsible for the defeat in Texas and called him a "RINO" —Republican in name only— despite having previously supported his reelection. He also blamed Fox News for giving too much space to the Democrats, without providing evidence that the selection of its guests was a cause of his party's defeats. Instead of focusing his messages on a common explanation, he pointed to specific candidates and media outlets.
At the same time, he stated to The New York Times that he was willing to accept the results and to work with the Democrats. This willingness opens the door to potential agreements, although his criticisms of the defeated candidates and his warnings of vetoes suggest a challenging relationship with the incoming Congress.
A Congress capable of investigating and restraining the White House
The institutional consequences will begin to be felt when the new Congress is established on January 3, 2027. The Democratic majority in the Senate will be able to influence the confirmation of federal positions and judges, as well as lead its committees. If the projected control of the House of Representatives is also solidified, that party will have greater capacity to set the legislative agenda, demand documents, and hold hearings on actions taken by the Executive. This does not mean that Trump will lose the constitutional powers of the presidency.
Democratic representative Robert Garcia, who is set to chair the House Oversight Committee, has already announced his intention to investigate the business dealings of the Trump family, possible abuses by ICE and the Department of Homeland Security, and the management of Jeffrey Epstein's files. These are priorities and allegations from the opposition that will require investigations and evidence, rather than conclusions of criminal liability established by the announcement.
Trump retains an important tool for negotiating or blocking legislative projects: the veto. Before the elections, he already warned that he could become the "Mr. Veto" in the face of a Democratic majority. Overriding a presidential veto requires two-thirds of the votes in both chambers, significantly more than a simple majority. Thus, even with a Congress controlled by the opposition, the Democrats will not be able to impose their entire agenda without obstacles: a period of negotiations, institutional clashes, and potential blockades begins.
The political challenge of Trump's last two years
The elections on November 3 do not change who occupies the White House. They do affect the political leverage of the president to push legislation, shield his Administration from parliamentary scrutiny, and present his proposals as backed by a majority in Congress. Trump bet on mobilizing his personal electorate; the results indicate that this strategy was not enough in several of the most secure states for the Republicans.
The presidential term will conclude in January 2029. Until then, the actual impact of this defeat will depend on how the recounts are resolved, the priorities adopted by the Democrats, and the agreements the White House is able to reach. The new Congress will also need to respond to a demand expressed by numerous voters: to ease the pressure of prices on American households.
Related videos:
Filed under: