
Related videos:
The decision of the Donald Trump administration to allow the arrival of a Russian oil tanker in Cuba does not necessarily indicate a relaxation of pressure on the regime, but could be part of a broader strategy to control the energy flow to the island.
The vessel Anatoli Kolodkin, carrying approximately 730,000 barrels of crude oil, arrived in Cuba amid an unprecedented energy crisis, characterized by prolonged blackouts and an economy that is practically at a standstill.
However, far from representing a change in policy, the movement reinforces a key idea: the supply of fuel to the island is largely conditioned by Washington.
According to Bloomberg, the current U.S. strategy is not to completely cut off access to oil but to regulate it. In practice, this means allowing sporadic shipments —such as that of the Russian tanker— while maintaining pressure on the regime by restricting its stable access to fuel and financing.
“The only oil that will reach Cuba is the one that the United States allows”, summarized journalist Eric Martin, an expert on the State Department, while analyzing the decision. In this context, the plan aims to reposition the United States as a central player in the energy supply to the island, replacing traditional allies such as Venezuela or Russia.
The impact of the shipment is, moreover, limited. Cuba requires around 100,000 barrels daily to sustain its electric system and its economy, so the Russian shipment would barely cover about a week of consumption. This confirms that it is a temporary relief, not a structural solution.
Meanwhile, Washington would already be adopting a selective approach: allowing the sale of fuel to the emerging private sector in Cuba, but not to the State, which adds additional pressure on the regime's structures.
In this context, the arrival of Russian oil does not contradict the pressure policy of the United States; rather, it could indicate a tactical shift: moving from total isolation to a model of gradual control, in which each energy supply depends, directly or indirectly, on Washington's decision.
Filed under: